Vishwas,

I think I see where you're headed.

The text under discussion is:

   Routing using the tunnels SHOULD work
   seamlessly without any updates to the higher level application
   configuration i.e.  OSPF configuration, when the tunnel parameter
   changes.

I read this a requirement being placed on the higher level protocol, but
I believe your intent was on the solution.  How about rephrasing along
the lines of a requirement on the ADVPN solution? Perhaps something like:

   The ADVPN solution SHOULD NOT increase the amount of information
   required to configure protocols running over IPsec tunnels.

Lou

On 12/6/2012 1:55 PM, Vishwas Manral wrote:
> Hi Lou,
> 
> I have included the other comments. The last one remaining is:
> 
>     > VM> I think this is an important requirement. A tunnel should be
>     able to
>     > provide an interface by which when tunnel IP parameters change we
>     do not
>     > have to change any configuration for higher application like
>     Routing. I
>     > had earlier mentioned in more generic terms earlier but changed to the
>     > terms provided based on feedback from the list.
> 
>     What higher level protocols like most routing protocols that use the
>     tunnel interface IP addresses in operation?
> 
>     >
>     > The entire idea is the with scale configuration needs to be
>     reduced and
>     > that needs to happen across layers, so every layer needs to
>     provide the
>     > service. Let me know what it is I am unable to convey.
> 
>     sure, but I think you're placing new requirements on the routing &
>     tunneling protocols.
> 
> VM> There are no restrictions on an application protocol like Routing.
> The idea is that the lower needs to provide a functionality, so that if
> required a higher layer can use it. There is no restriction at all on
> the higher layer. Do let me know if that is clearer?
> 
> Thanks,
> Vishwas
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> IPsec mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
> 
_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec

Reply via email to