Yes it is. That's why I mentioned that this is my personal opinion. You
might have different personal opinions.
Yaron
On 12/11/2012 12:02 AM, Dan Harkins wrote:
Hello,
On Mon, December 10, 2012 10:43 am, Yaron Sheffer wrote:
Hi,
following the recent discussion on the mailing list, Scott Fluhrer and
myself just published a draft that updates RFC 5996 by adding the
required recipient-side tests for ECDH. Please see
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-sheffer-ipsecme-dh-checks-00.txt.
We have not addressed the issues raised by Dan and Tero regarding
inconsistencies between various RFCs that define ECDH groups for IKE. I
personally deem these issues to be out of scope of the current document.
If you're planning on updating a standards-track product of this working
group then isn't it up to the group to decide whether they want to tackle
various issues?
Dan.
_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
