Hi Yaron,
The issue is that it has to be announcement by the IESG secretary 2
weeks in advance.
End of last year I suggested to simplify the rules for virtual interim
meetings but my proposal was not well received, see
http://list-archives.org/2012/12/03/ietf-ietf-org/simplifying-our-processes-conference-calls/f/1357342837
For some people it seems very important that the call conference call is
announced on the IETF announcement list. It appears that there are
people who are not on the working group mailing lists but would like to
participate in conference calls.
For that reason just announcing it on the mailing list does not count.
Ciao
Hannes
On 04/28/2013 10:20 AM, Yaron Sheffer wrote:
Hi Michael,
formally yes, we only need 2 weeks' notice for a conference call:
http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/interim-meetings.html
But the date is not (yet) set in stone. Let us know if you cannot attend
for any reason.
Thanks,
Yaron
On 2013-04-28 03:17, Michael Richardson wrote:
"Yaron" == Yaron Sheffer <[email protected]> writes:
Yaron> We propose to meet May 7, at 9:00am PST (16:00 UTC, 12:00
noon EST, 19:00
Yaron> Israel) for 1 hour. We will publish a bridge number a week
Yaron> before the meeting.
okay.
Is that enough notice?
I agree that the problem likely needs be solved in a standard way.
_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
