On May 10, 2013, at 10:13 AM, Michael Richardson <[email protected]> wrote:
> I can not speculate as to whether there is prior art, but it seems to > match what we have been discussing. <chair-hat on> "We" have not been discussing it, and nor should we. Certicom has filed numerous IPR statements with the IETF over more than a decade. Earlier discussions of earlier IPR statements have not come to any general understanding of what Certicom claims and what they intend to do with those claims. In the absence of that understanding (which can be aided by Certicom at any time), there is no point in using the WG mailing list for guessing. WG participants who want to read more about IPR are advised to see <https://www.ietf.org/ipr/>. --Paul Hoffman _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
