HI Tero,
one editorial error, copied from RFC5996:
on Page 22, in the description of Next Payload, the sentence
In the header of an Encrypted payload, the Next Payload field is set
to the payload type of the first contained payload (instead of 0);
conversely, the Next Payload field of the last contained payload
is set to zero).
has extra round bracket at the end.
Regards,
Valery Smyslov.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tero Kivinen" <kivi...@iki.fi>
To: <ipsec@ietf.org>
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2013 4:15 PM
Subject: [IPsec] FWD from Cao Zhen \(CZ\): [Lwip] WGLC for
I-Ddraft-ietf-lwig-ikev2-minimal-01.txt
My draft-ietf-lwig-ikev2-minimal-01.txt is starting WGLC in the lwig
WG, and as this is most likely interesting for people also in the
ipsecme wg you might want to go and read the document. The comments
and discussion about the draft should most likely be on the lwig
mailing list (l...@ietf.org).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
kivi...@iki.fi
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
IPsec@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
IPsec@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
