I’m incredibly biased here but I would really like to see this document progress. If we have the data that allows up to move to IS then I think we should do it.
spt On Oct 18, 2013, at 11:28, Michael Richardson <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yaron Sheffer <[email protected]> wrote: >> We would like to progress IKEv2 to Internet Standard, and the way we do >> it is by re-publishing it with slight modifications (basically editing >> for existing errata and adding references to documents published since > > Good. > >> the original RFC). A draft already exists, thanks Tero [1]. If we do >> not hear significant objections, we would like to adopt the document as >> a WG document by Monday, Oct. 21. > > +1. > > -- > Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works > > > _______________________________________________ > IPsec mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
