> Correct. > you'd have to write an ID on a new Notify type. Or on a new Configuration Attribute if that's more appropriate - see section 3.15.1 of RFC 5996.
Thanks, --David > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Michael Richardson > Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2013 12:18 PM > To: Paul Simon > Cc: <[email protected]>; Tero Kivinen > Subject: Re: [IPsec] Query regarding Qos with IKE > > > Paul Simon <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yes now it is clear that IKE is not supposed to do DSCP negotiation > > Thanks for the explanations. > > *negotiation* is the key word. > negotiation != notification > > > [PAUL] I have gone through RFC 5996 section 3.10.1 notify message types. > > But could not find a suitable message type to convey dscp information. > > Can you suggest which notification message should be used here ? > > Correct. > you'd have to write an ID on a new Notify type. > > > -- > Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works > _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
