On Nov 7, 2013, at 6:46 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Nov 7, 2013, at 2:11 AM, Yaron Sheffer <[email protected]> wrote: > >> ... >> IIRC we published RFC 5903 using the old code points because there was no >> objection, i.e. no indication that people had deployed pre-errata 4753. >> Whether this was the right thing to do or not is not very interesting now. >> >> So, seeing that people are slowly moving to ECC, I would like some input >> from the group on whether to progress RFC 5903. We will need to demonstrate >> implementation experience to do that. > > "Slowly moving"? I'm not sure they are moving at all. It may be there are > implementations of IPSec/IKE with ECC, but I've never encountered one in the > wild.
Huh? The VPN products from Cisco, Juniper and Check Point support them, as well as both StrongSwan and OpenSwan. I'm sure there are others as well. Yoav _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
