On Tue, 12 Nov 2013, Tero Kivinen wrote:
Paul Wouters writes:
Implementors still need to name that struct. Instead of everyone
coming up with their own name it would be good to have a standard
name for it.
I do not think it is that important to have names, I am good at
inventing better names than what they use in standards :-)
Unlike you, we hope that our customers send us patches :)
As it is not payload, I used "Last Substruc" instead. The data inside
those are Proposal or Transform Substructures.
Thanks for the changes :)
Paul
_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
