Same drill for 4303:
*The following questions document whether the syntax and semantics of the
protocol were implemented:
- Which of the following ESP packet formats does your implementation support:
- separate encryption and integrity algorithms:
- combined mode algorithms:
- Which processing semantics does your implementation support:
- Transport Mode:
- Tunnel Mode:
- Auditing:
The following questions document whether interoperability has been achieved as
well as other intangibles the IESG will be interested:
- What evidence do you have that your implementation can interoperate with
other implementations?
- In your opinion, are there unused features in the RFC that greatly increase
implementation complexity?
- Errata was filed against RFC 4303 and has been included
in**https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kent-ipsecme-esp-rfc4303bis/**; are
any of the incorporated errata problematic for your implementation?
Additional information (optional):*
_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec