Same drill for 4303:

*The following questions document whether the syntax and semantics of the 
protocol were implemented:

- Which of the following ESP packet formats does your implementation support:
        - separate encryption and integrity algorithms:
        - combined mode algorithms:
- Which processing semantics does your implementation support:
        - Transport Mode:
        - Tunnel Mode:
        - Auditing:

The following questions document whether interoperability has been achieved as 
well as other intangibles the IESG will be interested:

- What evidence do you have that your implementation can interoperate with 
other implementations?

- In your opinion, are there unused features in the RFC that greatly increase 
implementation complexity?

- Errata was filed against RFC 4303 and has been included 
in**https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kent-ipsecme-esp-rfc4303bis/**; are 
any of the incorporated errata problematic for your implementation?

Additional information (optional):*


_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec

Reply via email to