Here’s a proposed set of question for RFC 3948 implementers: The following questions document whether your implementation supports the syntax and semantics of the protocol:
- Which of the following packet formats does your implementation support:
- UDP-Encapsulated ESP Header Format (y/n):
- IKE Header Format for Port 4500 (y/n):
- NAT-Keepalive Packet Format (y/n):
- Which of the following encapsulation and decapsulation processing rules does
your implementation support:
- Auxiliary Processing
- Tunnel Mode Decapsulation NAT Procedure (y/n):
- Transport Mode Decapsulation NAT Procedure (y/n):
- Transport Mode ESP Encapsulation (y/n):
- Transport Mode ESP Decapsulation (y/n):
- Tunnel Mode ESP Encapsulation (y/n):
- Tunnel Mode ESP Decapsulation (y/n):
- Does your implementation support the NAT keepalive procedure? (y/n):
The following questions document whether interoperability has been achieved as
well as other intangibles the IESG will be interested.
- What evidence do you have that your implementation can interoperate with
other implementations?
- In your opinion, are there unused features in the RFC that greatly increase
implementation complexity?
Additional information (optional):
spt
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
