Brian Weis <[email protected]> wrote: > The ADVPN proposals currently state how they believe they meet the > requirements of RFC 7018, but not how well they match each of the > actual use cases. The minutes of the Vancouver meeting record that > Steve Hanna suggested "it might be helpful to have each of proposal > teams describe in more detail how their proposal would address the 3 > use cases". There was some agreement (including from Sean) that this > would be valuable information for the protocol starting point selection > process.
> Yaron & Paul, do you agree and if so can you give the authors some
> guidance on what you think would be most useful? E.g., have each
> proposal document how RFC7018's three use cases meet the 16+ RFC7108
> requirements, or something else?
Yes, please revise their ID, add a compliance section or some such.
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting for hire =-
pgpcSKxcXUc_r.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
