Hi, Ipsec. My name is Ivan Ananich, I work for Joint Stock Company "Moscow Integrated Power Company" in the customer VPN networking division and we have already chosen that technology over barebone IPsec.
We vote for technology Flexible Dynamic Mesh VPN (DMVPN). http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-detienne-dmvpn-00 We think this this is a superior specification that truly integrates networking and security instead of having a security protocol route packets. Customers have invested man-decades of work and millions of $ in validating this solutn (and we do not want our-customers/tax-payers re-doing this on a future unproven technology) We are not interested in debugging/troubleshooting a new implementation of a new protocol when the existing one does everything and more. We want the IETF to confirm to its guiding principals of "rough consensus and running code" --------------------------- Best Regards, Ivan Ananich mailto:[email protected] _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
