Ok, no problem here ... Thanks, --David +++Sent from Blackberry
----- Original Message ----- From: Paul Hoffman [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2014 09:21 AM To: Black, David Cc: ipsec <[email protected]> Subject: ICV sizes On Mar 8, 2014, at 1:37 PM, Black, David <[email protected]> wrote: > I have no strong opinion on ICV size for GCM and GMAC, but I am interested > in the outcome as an author of the Block Storage IPsec profile update > (draft-ietf-storm-ipsec-ips-update-04). That draft does not currently > express requirements on ICV length. That draft's in Authors 48 hours at > the moment as part of the entire iSCSI draft cluster, and it could be held > to apply the ICV length outcome determined here if that were deemed important. Making technical changes to a document in AUTH48 is a really bad idea. If you were not specific enough when writing the draft, you should probably just leave it alone. --Paul Hoffman _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
