Valery Smyslov <[email protected]> wrote: >> Paul ps. i also still prefer AUTH_NONE over "NULL AUTH", as to me NULL >> looks more like an error while "none" conveys intent.
> I remember it. However I'm still waiting for other's opinions on this.
> Naming is not a problem.
I prefer AUTH_NONE over "NULL AUTH".
Still, that doesn't convey enough intent; AUTH_DIDNTWANTTO, or something
like that might say it better, but that's a mouthful, so I can live with
AUTH_NONE if we can't do better.
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
pgpDLUfGgWCNa.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
