Valery Smyslov writes: > if new version of draft-kivinen-ipsecme-ikev2-rfc5996bis is issued, > then it is also possible fix a typo I've come across. > > Section 2.8.1, second para: > This form of rekeying may temporarily result in multiple similar SAs > between the same pairs of nodes. When there are two SAs eligible to > receive packets, a node MUST accept incoming packets through either > SA. If redundant SAs are created though such a collision, the SA > ^^^^^^ > s/though/through > created with the lowest of the four nonces used in the two exchanges > SHOULD be closed by the endpoint that created it.
This typo was already noticed and fixed during the rfc-editor process. -- [email protected] _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
