Hi,

Sorry to be a little slow to reply.  I was offline over Thanksgiving, just saw 
the messages yesterday afternoon.

Of course I favor adoption, and am willing to work with anyone who can 
contribute to the development of an appropriate protocol.  Momentum seems to be 
toward a version supporting a variety of out-of-band mechanisms, and I’m 
willing to work in that direction.

Shota is looking in to the numerous issues I detailed in the long message right 
after IETF.

                β€”Rod

> On Dec 2, 2014, at 4:19 PM, Yaron Sheffer <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Here's a quick reminder to speak up if you're interested in this document and 
> are willing to contribute as co-author or reviewer.
> 
> Thanks,
>       Yaron
> 
> On 11/25/2014 10:06 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
>> <chair hats on>
>> 
>> Greetings again. There is a small emerging industry of crypto solutions that 
>> transmit keys using Quantum Key Distribution (QKD), and then use those keys 
>> for classical high-speed encryption. Several such solutions are using IKE, 
>> and there is a perceived need to standardize this usage. If so, that 
>> standardization should be done in this Working Group.
>> 
>> If you agree with the need to standardize this usage, and believe that 
>> draft-nagayama-ipsecme-ipsec-with-qkd is likely to be a good starting place 
>> for that standardization, and are willing to review and contribute text to 
>> the document if it is adopted by the WG, please say so on the list. This WG 
>> has a history of adopting documents but then not having enough reviewers for 
>> us to feel confident that we are making a good standard, so we need to see a 
>> reasonable number of actively interested people before we adopt the 
>> document. If it is not adopted, the authors can ask for it to be published 
>> as an RFC through individual submission or by the Independent Submissions 
>> Editor.
>> 
>> Please reply by December 8, 2015.
>> 
>> --Paul Hoffman and Yaron Sheffer
>> _______________________________________________
>> IPsec mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> IPsec mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec

_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec

Reply via email to