Hi Paul

Sorry for the late reply. Hopefully the following is more clear?

When designing systems which will provide connectivity for
non-authenticated users, the system SHOULD be designed with the capacity
to support not only the maximum intended number of peers, but also include
an additional number of sessions which are created due to malicious or
erroneous behaviour. This safety margin will allow a system to still
operate safely under load until it is exceeded.


On 13/01/2015 23:16, "Paul Wouters" <[email protected]> wrote:

>>
>>What I was alluding to is covered now in section 3.2 (and in Paul's
>>email). However I think some final words at the end of 3.2 such as 'For
>>this reason systems should be designed to accommodate legitimate and
>>non-legitimate non-authenticated peers', would then make this message
>>crystal clear.
>
>Can you propose text? I personally find "legitimate and non-legitimate
>non-authenticated peers" very unclear. I don't think a server can ever
>tell those two aparts based on IKE.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec

Reply via email to