"Paul Hoffman" <[email protected]> writes: > There is general agreement that this document is a good starting point > for a WG item. Yoav and Simon: please prepare this as a -00 draft, > incorporating any of the relevant suggestions you got during the past > few weeks.
I have uploaded a WG -00 based on feedback. The document is now shorter than Yoav's version. I believe that this document should closely match the CFRG document, and that contains relevant discussions, algorithm descriptions and test vectors already. If there is any area where this WG want to deviate from the CFRG document (text that I now may have removed), I believe we need to articulate that and consider whether that is something to bring back to the CFRG for more general considerations. I am hoping that there will be no such area (since that may slow down the CFRG progress), and I expect and appreciate everyone's review to get consensus around that. /Simon
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
