Tero Kivinen <[email protected]> wrote: > And he pointed out that this asks for mandatory to implemented key > size for RSA to be 1024 or 2048-bits.
So, an implementation could support 1024 and 2048 bit key lengths, but not
1536 bit ones?
> I.e. should we modify this also while updating the RFC4307? We could
> add section about the mandatory to implement authentication methods,
> and specify which methods are to be used, for example require RSA key
> lengths of 2048 bits, and perhaps say that implementations SHOULD
> support RSA key lengths up to 4096 bits.
So, this is different than "2048" and "4096".
This text would support a key length of 2304, for instance.
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
