Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 28, 2016, at 16:43, Daniel Migault <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Paul, > > I leave my co-authors to respond on the YANG aspects. > > Regarding the initial-retransmission-timeout I think we meant a time in > second. Do you think we need more options? Libreswan retransmits at 0.5 second and the doubling the interval up to 30 seconds. So 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 16. I don't think that you can put that in? Note I didn't read all the options, there might be others too. I think to be sure, you need to look at various implementations and see if it can work. Paul > BR, > Daniel > >> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 11:29 AM, Paul Wouters <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Sun, 27 Mar 2016, Daniel Migault wrote: >> >>> Subject: [IPsec] FW: New Version Notification for >>> draft-tran-ipsecme-ikev2-yang-00.txt >> >>> Please find our first version for the YANG model for IKEv2. Feel free >>> to post comments. I would be also happy to have face-to-face >>> discussions on the draft - especially from IKEv2 implementers. >> >> Might be good for me to have a talk about it, especially because I'm >> not a yang person. . I'm still a bit confused about the syntax. There is >> code in the document that looks like "ready to use" but also looks like >> "example to use". like: >> >> description >> "This YANG module defines the configuration and operational >> state data for Internet Key Exchange version 2 (IKEv2) on >> IETF draft. >> Copyright (c) 2016 Ericsson AB. >> All rights reserved."; >> >> All rights reserved? huh? Is that an example? or is this an error? >> >> I'm confused about units too, like: >> >> leaf initial-retransmission-timeout { >> type uint32; >> description >> "initial retransmission timeout value"; >> } >> >> look weird to me. What's the unit here? uint32 is not a unit, it is >> a number Is this seconds? miliseconds? seconds since 1970? Since 1772? >> >> Some of it looks like just copying IANA registries? So that would be >> outdated quickly. How would that get updated? Should we really put >> chunks of code in RFCs like that? >> >> Paul >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> IPsec mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec > > _______________________________________________ > IPsec mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
_______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
