On Wed, 20 Jul 2016, Tero Kivinen wrote:
In the end I think the best option would be to just include both RFCs
in the references column, i.e. make the final table to be something
like this:
Number Name ESP Reference IKEv2 Reference
...
18 ENCR_AES_GCM_8 [RFC4106][RFCXXXX] [RFC5282][RFCXXXX]
19 ENCR_AES_GCM_12 [RFC4106][RFCXXXX] [RFC5282][RFCXXXX]
20 ENCR_AES_GCM_16 [RFC4106][RFCXXXX] [RFC5282][RFCXXXX]
...
25 ENCR_CAMELLIA_CCM_8 [RFC5529][RFCXXXX] -
26 ENCR_CAMELLIA_CCM_12 [RFC5529][RFCXXXX] -
27 ENCR_CAMELLIA_CCM_16 [RFC5529][RFCXXXX] -
where the RFCXXX would be this RFC.
Works for me.
Check out the IANA considerations section and comment if there is
something you are not happy about.
Looks good. (the word "does" is a little weird but the RFC Editor can
reword it)
I believe this document is ready for WGLC,
Paul
_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
IPsec@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
