One question, currently SHA-1 signature are not only allowed by RFC7296,
but even "SHOULD use as default”. 4307bis does not change this. Shouldn’t
something be done about this. Right now (and even with 4307bis):

RSASSA-PKCS1-v1.5 with SHA-1 is MUST support and everything else
(PSS+SHA-2, ECSDA+SHA-2) is just SHOULD (not even SHOULD+) and
PKCS1-v1.5+SHA-2 is MAY.

This does not seem good even short term... Feels like at a minimum, some
authentication method with SHA-2 should be mandatory to support.

Cheers,
John



_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec

Reply via email to