Kathleen, I am just getting back after taking a long holiday. Sorry I was AFK on this one.
We want to advance rfc7321bis to go through the remainder of IESG review with 4307bis as a pair. Unfortunately, I wasn’t able to get this done before leaving on holiday. I need to do a WGLC on rfc7321bis starting ASAP this week. Can you hold 4307bis for a bit to have the two run concurrently? Thanks, Dave From: IPsec [mailto:ipsec-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Kathleen Moriarty Sent: Friday, January 06, 2017 4:01 PM To: p...@nohats.ca Cc: ipsec@ietf.org Subject: Re: [IPsec] AD review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc4307bis On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 3:56 PM, Paul Wouters <p...@nohats.ca<mailto:p...@nohats.ca>> wrote: On Fri, 6 Jan 2017, Kathleen Moriarty wrote: I never got an answer as to whether or not I should wait on the last call, so I pushed it through. No comments came in during the holiday period. Should last call be extended? Or does the WG feel the reason was because the document is ready? If the latter then I'll get it ready for an IESG telechat. I'd prefer to put it on 2/2/2017 as there are already a fair number of documents on the telechat in 2 weeks. If you schedule it for 2/2 then I guess we can give people another two weeks for comments? Although I'm not sure if that means we will get more comments :) I'm not sure we'll get more either. Is 2/2 okay or is there any rush for this draft? Thanks! Paul -- Best regards, Kathleen
_______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
