We support the proposals and will publish updated the documents regarding
diet-esp and its associated IKEv2 extension. We believe
draft-mglt-ipsecme-diet-esp and draft-ipsecme-ikev2-extention could be a
good starting point.

The proposed text for the charter could be:
A growing number of use cases for constraint network - but not limited to -
have shown interest in reducing ESP overhead by compressing ESP fields. The
WG will define extensions of ESP and IKEv2 to enable ESP header
compression.

draft-mglt-ipsecme-diet-esp and draft-mglt-ipsecme-ikev2-extention are
expected to be good starting points.

Yours,
Daniel



On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 12:33 PM, Tommy Pauly <[email protected]> wrote:

> + 1 to these proposals
>
> I'd also like to see the work on drafts like DIET-ESP
> (draft-mglt-ipsecme-diet-esp-04) be incorporated. I think we'll have some
> growing use cases for IPsec in constrained networks, and as that develops,
> extensions and modifications to the protocol to make IKEv2 and ESP work
> efficiently in those conditions will be necessary. (These would likely fall
> into the host-to-host use case described in the charter.)
>
> Thanks,
> Tommy
>
> > On Oct 27, 2017, at 7:51 AM, Valery Smyslov <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I think that the following items can be considered for the new charter.
> >
> > 1. Develop load sharing cluster solution for IKEv2/IPsec. The possible
> charter text:
> >
> >       MOBIKE protocol [RFC4555] is used to move existing
> >       IKE/IPsec SA from one IP address to another. However,
> >       in MOBIKE it is the initiator of the IKE SA (i.e. remote access
> client)
> >       that controls this process. If there are several responders
> >       each having own IP address and acting together as a load sharing
> cluster,
> >       then it is desirable for them to have ability to request initiator
> to switch to
> >       a particular    member. The working group will analyze the
> possibility
> >       to extend MOBIKE protocol or to develop new IKE extension
> >       that will allow to build load sharing clusters in an interoperable
> way.
> >
> > 2. Make IKEv2 Postquantum Cryptography ready. In particular - make it
> >    able to transfer large payloads in initial exchange without having
> >    IP fragmentation issues. The possible charter text:
> >
> >       Postquantum Cryptography brings new key exchange methods.
> >       Most of these methods that are known to date have much larger
> public
> >       keys then conventional Diffie-Hellman public keys. Direct using
> >       these methods in IKEv2 might lead to a number of problems
> >       due to the increased size of initial IKEv2 messages. The working
> group will
> >       analyze the possible problems and develop a solution, that will
> >       make adding Postquantum key exchange methods more easy.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Valery.
> >
> >
> >> We will be meeting at Monday morning 09:30-11:00 for 1.5 hours. Our
> >> main agenda item will be the rechartering text, i.e., our charter will
> >> expire by the end of year, and we have most of our chartered work
> >> already completed, or almost finished, so we need to decide what new
> >> items (if any) we take to our charter, or wheter we shut down the WG.
> >>
> >> In last IETF we had people with items which we could add to charter,
> >> so I want those people wanting to add things to charter to send an
> >> email to the mailing list about what items they would like to propose
> >> to the charter, and preliminary charter text for the item.
> >>
> >> If we do not receive any proposed charter texts, then I assume we do
> >> not have any more work to do after we finish our current charter...
> >>
> >> Also if there is people wanting to present anything in the next
> >> IPsecME IETF session, send email to wg chairs [email protected].
> >> --
> >> [email protected]
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> IPsec mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > IPsec mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
>
> _______________________________________________
> IPsec mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
>
_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec

Reply via email to