Paul, Sorry for the late comments.
A question to your draft: Introduction: Is "Split DNS" less about "configuration for the secure tunnels", but more about having two zones, one to be used by the internal network, the other used by the external network? Basically Split DNS directs internal hosts to an internal domain name server for name resolution and external hosts are directed to an external domain name server for name resolution. Is it correct? If yes, the requests from internal network (the network within VPN) may not be via tunnel, isn't it? Or your "split DNS" is about one DNS with some domain name resolution requests are from IPSec tunnels and others are not? Linda -----Original Message----- From: IPsec [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Paul Wouters Sent: Monday, January 22, 2018 12:49 PM To: [email protected] WG <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [IPsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ipsecme-split-dns-04.txt On Mon, 22 Jan 2018, [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> wrote: > Subject: [IPsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ipsecme-split-dns-04.txt > A diff from the previous version is available at: > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ipsecme-split-dns-04 This version addresses the two points raised by Paul Hoffman. I believe this document is ready for IETF LC. Paul _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
_______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
