Hi Paul,

> Some note would be good because apparently strongswan insists of the
> KEY_LENGTH attribute they shouldn’t be there?

Yes, we did that incorrectly before 5.6.3 [1].  Since then the key
length attribute is omitted, but it's still possible to add a transform
with it to a proposal by using the chacha20poly1305compat keyword (for
compatibility with older releases).

Regards,
Tobias

[1] https://wiki.strongswan.org/versions/69

_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec

Reply via email to