Hi, I'm going to update IKE_AUX draft (in particular - change the way it is authenticated based on recent discussion with Scott).
I recall that there were some complaints that the name IKE_AUX is not good because it can easily be mixed up with IKE_AUTH Actually, the phonetically close name was selected intentionally to show that these exchanges are related. However, I'm not a native speaker and not always can realize how good or bad this similarity sounds for a native ear. So, my question to WG - do we need to change the name? If yes, then to what? Possible variants - IKE_INT (intermediate), IKE_PRE_AUTH. Something else? Regards, Valery. _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
