Suresh Krishnan has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-ipsecme-split-dns-14: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ipsecme-split-dns/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- * Sections 3.1 and 7 I have a hard time seeing why the length of the INTERNAL_DNS_DOMAIN attribute would ever be zero. Do you expect someone to send an empty attribute? If not, the attribute definition should be updated in Section 7. * Meta comment Since the draft needs and uses a lot of example domain names, I would suggest using a reserved TLD (e.g. ".example") from BCP32 to build up the examples instead of using registered domain names. _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
