> > 1. The exchange is renamed from IKE_AUX to INTERMEDIATE (thanks Tommy!). > > I believe this name reflects its purpose, it's easy to pronounce and > > hard to mix > > with existing exchanges. > > It is missing the prefix IKE_ ?
As well as INFORMATIONAL and CREATE_CHILD_SA. > In my opinion, IKE_SA_INIT / IKE_AUTH should have been named > consistenly, eg either IKE_SA_INIT / IKE_SA_AUTH or IKE_INIT / IKE_AUTH I agree that it would have been better, but we have what we have now. > So in that light, this would be better as IKE_INTERMEDIATE It's a bit too long in my opinion :-) > INFORMATIONAL should have been IKE_INFORMATIONAL, and CREATE_CHILD_SA > is an abomination to act either on IKE or CHILD SA without seperating > its exchange :) > > But if people insist on INTERMEDIATE, I won't complain further. Definitely not "insist" for now, only "suggest" :-) > Consistency is already lost so it is time to stop painting :) Yes, that was my final thought too. Regards, Valery. > Paul _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
