Paul Wouters <[email protected]> wrote: >> I think we need an RFC to at least categorize the algorithms, unless >> we want the IANA registry to have stuff like “SHOULD-“ and “MAY+:
> We only need to add the SHOULD NOT and MUST NOT's and possibly some
> MAY's that are deemed otherwise ancient and deprecated (eg CAST)
> Anything with a + would surely not be deprecated as it is still
> climbing up. Anything with a - is still in use and we cannot deprecate
> it yet.
so... I think that we did this in (spirit at least in) RFC8247?
It seems that maybe we forgot to tell IANA to deprecate anything that was
SHOULD NOT/MUST NOT, or that fell off the list. Maybe this can be clarified
as an IESG directive rather than as a new document.
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
