Just submitted thank you all for your comments and suggestions! Yours, Daniel
On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 1:58 PM Tero Kivinen <[email protected]> wrote: > Valery Smyslov writes: > > > One additional question came to my mind on whether we update the > > > RFC mentioned above or not. We could consider our document as an > > > alternate mechanism to generate the IV of the existing RFC. > > > > No, since you define your own transforms (with own code points) you > > don’t need to update those RFCs. > > I agree on that, and I think the new text is good, please submit new > updated version. > -- > [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ > IPsec mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec >
_______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
