Hi,
I support adoption and the charter addition. (No surprise as I'm a
contributor to this work.)
Also, I know of no IPR that applies to this draft.
Lou
On 10/26/2019 11:17 AM, Tero Kivinen wrote:
So this is fast (one week) adoption call for the
draft-hopps-ipsecme-iptfs draft to be accepted to the WG document. We
did have quite positive feedback in last IETF meeting and the charter
item is being worked on in parallel to this call.
If you support adopting this document as WG document and as a starting
place for the charter item proposed for the WG, then send email
indicating your support to the [email protected] mailing-list. If you
have any comments or reservations send them to list too.
This adoption call finishes at 2019-11-04.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The demand for Traffic Flow Confidentiality has been increasing in the user
community; however, the current method defined in RFC4303 (i.e., add null
padding to each ESP payload) is very inefficient in it's use of network
resources. The working group will develop an alternative TFC solution that
provides for efficient use of network resources.
_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
