> All packets are sent over the same SA, but on different cpus. This means
> that the 'rest' might not be in the next ESP message. The other cpu
> could have TXed some ESP packets before, it is a race.
> 
> In this example, flow0 is encapsulated on cpu0, flow1 is encapsulated on cpu1,
> both on the same SA.
> 
> ESP1 contains flow0, but ESP2 contains flow1. The 'rest' from flow0 is
> encapsulated in ESP3, the 'rest' from flow1 is encapsulated in ESP4.
> So I think it is not clear how to do a correct reassembling here.

Ah, I see now. It seems to be a real problem and I think that in this case 
fragmentation 
must be disabled. And this must be discussed in the draft.

Regards,
Valery.

> Steffen

_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec

Reply via email to