OK, this is ridiculous. "non-inclusive behaviour"? Bullying? Gimme a break. If the editor of a draft in an IETF WG blocks legitimate email concerning the draft then perhaps the editor of the draft shouldn't be editor of the draft anymore. I'll volunteer to take over this draft. I don't block anyone and will tolerate all sorts of inclusive or non-inclusive behavior. Dan. On 5/5/21 8:08 PM, PMDF Internet Messaging wrote:
This report relates to a message you sent with the following header fields: Message-id: <[email protected]> Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 20:08:35 -0700 From: Dan Harkins <[email protected]> To: Paul Wouters <[email protected]>, [email protected] Subject: Re: [IPsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev1-algo-to-historic-00.txt Your message cannot be delivered to the following recipients: Recipient address: [email protected] Reason: Remote SMTP server has rejected address Diagnostic code: smtp;550 5.7.1 <[email protected]>: Sender address rejected: Refusing email from Dan Harkins for repeated bullying and non-inclusive behaviour Remote system: dns;mx.nohats.ca (TCP|198.137.202.94|47303|193.110.157.68|25) (mx.nohats.ca ESMTP Postfix)
-- "The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
