Lou Berger writes: > Hi Tero, > > You said: > > On 11/9/2021 5:11 AM, Tero Kivinen wrote: > > I think there is still bit of tweaking that can be done, > > Is this tweak being made as a blocking comment by the document Shepherd > or a non-blocking comment as a contributor?
No. It is just a comment. > If it's a blocking comment -- Sure let's make whatever change you want > (as long as long as the rest of the WG can live with the change/doesn't > break anything) so we can get this document out of the WG. The new version was posted on Monday, I will wait for at least a week to allow people to read the document and send their comments to list before I send document forward. During that time I hope to get the yang and mib documents also in a shape where they can be put forward at the same time (both of those documents do have some issues that I noticed during my shepherd review, and at least the MIB document missing IANA considerations section is blocking). > If as contributor -- can you live with the current text? It would be > great to get the document set to the IESG as discussed this week. I can live with the current text, I will assume there will be more comments to this during the IETF last call or IESG review time, but I will not be sending it to IESG this week, I will do it next week (most likely on Thursday as I have full schedule (16:00-04:00) on Monday-Wednesday as IEEE still continues until that). -- kivi...@iki.fi _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
