Hi Paul 

I have bytes burned into my brain, however the IETF interface YANG stats RFC 
7223 - and others, typically use octets for the named packet counters so we 
tried to be consistent with that. Maybe a question for the RFC editor if we 
should change the text description or it is clear enough. 

Thanks
Don  

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Wouters via Datatracker <[email protected]> 
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2022 1:59 PM
To: The IESG <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; 
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Paul Wouters' No Objection on draft-ietf-ipsecme-yang-iptfs-09: (with 
COMMENT)

Paul Wouters has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ipsecme-yang-iptfs-09: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email 
addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory 
paragraph, however.)


Please refer to 
https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ipsecme-yang-iptfs/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

# Paul Wouters, Security AD, comments for draft-ietf-ipsecme-yang-iptfs-08
CC @paulwouters

## COMMENTS

### bytes vs octets

The document describes counters in packets and octets, however usually these
counters are exposed as packets and bytes. It even presents this to the user as
bytes:

       leaf tx-octets {
         type yang:counter64;
         config false;
         description
           "Outbound Packet bytes";
       }

Why not use "bytes" instead of "octets" everywhere? For example RFC 9061 has:

       leaf bytes {
         type uint64;
         default "0";
         description
           "If the IPsec SA processes the number of bytes
            expressed in this leaf, the IPsec SA expires and
            SHOULD be rekeyed.  The value 0 implies
            infinite.";
       }

It also does not use "octets"



_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec

Reply via email to