Hi Warren,
Warren Kumari <[email protected]> writes:
On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 5:33 AM, Lars Eggert <[email protected]> wrote:
This CBR ESP tunnel is basically identical to a CBR pseudowire.
There was quite a bit of work/discussion between PWE3 and various
transport groups in the past that resulted in a set of guidance
on how such pseudowires are safe to deploy. This guidance needs
to be adopted here as well (or we'll need a much longer
discussion on what alternative guidance could look like and why.)
I'll happily admit that I haven't read that / those discussions, but
I'm glad that it sounds like there is existing work that can be
cribbed from…
Indeed, and we have in fact added a reference to RFC7893 to the document in
response to resolving this DISCUSS. :)
Thanks,
Chris.
_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
