Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ipsecme-iptfs-17: Discuss

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to 
https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ipsecme-iptfs/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCUSS:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Section 7.1 creates an IANA registry with "Expert Review" rules.  Of such a
registry, Section 4.5 of RFC 8126 says, among other things:

   The required documentation and review criteria, giving clear guidance
   to the designated expert, should be provided when defining the
   registry.

This document doesn't do so.  Is that guidance available somewhere else, or
should some be added here?


----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

The first question of the shepherd writeup was not completely answered. 
Question 18, which is particularly relevant here, was not answered at all.

Thanks for including Section 8.  This is always helpful to read.



_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec

Reply via email to