On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 04:15:54PM -0500, Paul Wouters wrote: > speaking with no hats on..... > On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 7:47 AM Steffen Klassert < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > Is there interest in doing a virtual interim to discuss an ESP re-design? > > > > I am very interested. It is a problem that we should fix sooner rather > than later. > > > First things to clarify would be: > > > > - Does the working group agree to the need of an ESP re-design? > > > > I would call it an update, not redesign, but yes :)
I don't mind how we call it, as long as we do it :) > > > > - Who is interested to work on that? > > > > I am as individual and wearing my $dayjob head and wearing my libreswan hat. > > > > - What are the problems to solve? > > > > This would be an important list to create, but I think we won't be able to > do it at an interim > without some prep work. I think that should happen on the list ? I think we need to agree on which problems needs to be addressed. This can happen on the list, but we should create a 'problem statement' document based on this. The document can be the scope on what we plan to work (and what not). _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
