Daniel,
> On Jan 13, 2023, at 8:33 PM, Daniel Migault <mglt.i...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> f not, to better understand, do we have an example of a packet that cannot be
> processed if the MTU is set to tunMAP but that can be processed if the MTU is
> set to EMTU_R.
As per intarea-tunnels, MTU is a highly overloaded term.
Tunnels relay packets that exceed their tunMAP but not their tunMTU (EMTU_R -
headers) using source fragmentation all the time.
However, that’s the issue. The reasons why what you’re trying to do isn’t
useful is already covered in detail in intarea-tunnels - and why not to do it
using IPv4 DF=0 in rfc6864.
It’s not useful to have an email exchange rehashing that content message by
message.
Joe
_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
IPsec@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
