We seem to have 3 open errata for IPsecME WG documents:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6940
For IKEv2 RFC7296 changing "the field must be empty" -> "the
SPI field must be empty" in the SPI Size field description in
section 3.10 (the errata only says section ".10", when it
should have been "3.10").
This errata should be marked as Verified.
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6339
This complains that "Curve25519 and Curve448 for IKEv2" RFC
8051, has Appendix A public keys for X25519 generated
incorrectly. I am not able to verify this as I do not have
code to verify the generated test vectors. If someone has code
that can verify the test vectors, please do so and report
here.
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6931
This note that was split out from the previous errata for
RFC8031, is not really an errata but a comment for future
revision RFC 8031. I think we could simply mark it as Held for
document update, and solve the issue when someone decides to
update RFC8031.
--
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
