On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 5:17 AM Tero Kivinen <[email protected]> wrote:
> Paul Wouters writes: > > See > https://www.iana.org/assignments/ikev2-parameters/ikev2-parameters.xhtml#ikev2-parameters-5 > > > > I noticed that the IKEv2 column for AES_GCM variants mentions RFC > > 8247. This should be RFC 8221. And for AES_CCM, the ESP and IKEv2 > > columns are missing the RFC 8247/8221 entries entirely. > > No. IKEv2 column should still be for IKEv2 use of the AES_GCM, thus > RFC8247 is more appropriate than RFC8221. > > But the reason RFC8247 is listed for ESP and IKEv2 reference columns > for the AES-GCM and CAMELLIA is because the RFC8247 changed the name > of those algorithms > Ohh right. Thanks for the correction. So I guess you are technically right, but it is very confusing when you glance at the registry :/ But good - no actions needed. Thank, Paul
_______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
