Ana Minaburo writes:
> From my point of view you need to work more on your draft to be aligned with
> SCHC. This work needs a better understanding of the SCHC header compression.
> And it will be required to be worked in parallel in both SCHC and IPsecME WG.
This is just adoption call for the IPsecME WG, where we check out if
there is enough people interested to work on this problem. After we
have adopted the document, then the real work on the document
starts, so there is plenty of time to align it with SCHC.
We already have in the IPsecME charter a following item:
A growing number of use cases for constrained networks - but not
limited to those networks - have shown interest in reducing ESP
(resp. IKEv2) overhead by compressing ESP (resp IKEv2) fields. The
WG will define extensions of ESP and IKEv2 to enable ESP header
compression.
And this work fits to that, so we just need to see there is enough
people interested working on this to adopt.
> On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 12:10 PM Daniel Migault <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Just to let you know that we will have a call for adoption for diet-esp,
> that is IPsec/ESP compression with SCHC.I will be in Prague so we can also
> discuss this face to face.
--
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
