On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 11:51 AM Kampanakis, Panos <kpanos= [email protected]> wrote:
> CFRG had https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-cfrg-schwabe-kyber/ , > https://bwesterb.github.io/draft-schwabe-cfrg-kyber/draft-cfrg-schwabe-kyber.html > for Kyber, but that was for the draft00 versions of Kyber deployed in early > TLS 1.3 codepoints. I believe the official spec for ML-KEM will be FIPS > 203. > Indeed. I was wrong. It is only for the hybrid's that have no normative references that we would need this. You are right that ml-kem would have a normative reference at NIST. My apologies for the error. Paul >
_______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
