Hi Paul, Please see inline
On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 at 01:35, Paul Wouters <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 17 Feb 2025, Tero Kivinen wrote: > > [ speaking as individual contributor ] > > > This email will start two week working group adoption call for > > draft-reddy-ipsecme-ikev2-pqc-auth document. If you are in favor of > > adopting this document for the initial work document for the PQC auth > > work item, reply this email. And especially if you have any objections > > adopting this document as base document, reply this email by > > explaining your objections. > > The document's title and body are widely different. The title claims > "Signature Authentication using PQC" but the body shows it is only > talking about ML-DSA and SLH-DSA. > Thanks, updated the title https://github.com/tireddy2/ikev2-pqc-auth/pull/15 . > > 1) I am in favour of a document that explains Signature Authentication > using PQC in general. > > 2) I am in favour of a document describing ML-DSA and SLH-DSA. > > 3) I am also in favour of a document describing one or two non-NIST > Signature Algorithms. > Do you have any specific non-NIST signature algorithms in mind ? NIST is evaluating 14 candidates for the second round of the Additional Digital Signatures. > > This draft seems to be 2) but named to appear to be 1) The draft discusses PQC signature algorithms in general but focuses on ML-DSA and SLH-DSA, as they are the only signature algorithms finalized by NIST in the first round. I believe the approach can be further generalized to support future PQC signature algorithms. -Tiru > > I would be in favour of splitting the document, and adopting both parts. > And hope that someone also submits a draft for 3) > > Paul > > _______________________________________________ > IPsec mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >
_______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
