I support adoption of the document. I think today I prefer it to be EESP than ESPv4.but we can leave that for further discussion. Yours, Daniel
On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 4:59 AM Wang Guilin <Wang.Guilin= [email protected]> wrote: > Also support adoption. The current ESP protocol do need to be updated, I > think. > > Guilin > > -----Original Message----- > From: Valery Smyslov <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, 7 April 2025 8:10 pm > To: 'Tero Kivinen' <[email protected]>; [email protected] > Subject: [IPsec] Re: WG Adoption call of draft draft-klassert-ipsecme-eesp > > Hi, > > I support adoption of this document as a starting point. > > Regards, > Valery. > > > As our charter is now updated, this document is working on the > > following charter > > item: > > > > The ESPv3 protocol was defined in 2005 and there may be a need > > to make enhancements to it. The working group will analyze the > > possible problems and work on solving them. This may include > > updating ESP, AH, and/or Wrapped ESP (WESP) standards, or > > result in a new security protocol. > > > > This email will start three week working group adoption call for > > draft-klassert- ipsecme-eesp document. If you are in favor of adopting > > this document, reply this email. And especially if you have any > > objections adopting this document as base document, reply this email by > explaining your objections. > > -- > > [email protected] > > > > _______________________________________________ > > IPsec mailing list -- [email protected] > > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ > IPsec mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > _______________________________________________ > IPsec mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > -- Daniel Migault Ericsson
_______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
