Hi Tero, > Tero Kivinen writes: > > Thom Wiggers writes: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I was going through the security considerations of RFC 8784 and I > > > saw the following: > > Ups, the RFC 8784 was the Mixing Preshared keys in the IKEv2, not the > algorithm implementation requirements for ESP and AH (RFC8221) or for > IKEv2 (RFC8247), which I assummed it to be. Thats why it is very bad > idea to only include RFC number, it is always better to refer > documents with their titles, and include RFC number only as extra > information... > > Anyways for that yes, submitting errata is fine.
And then what to do with RFC 9867, which references the Security Considerations section from RFC 8784? There is no details on symmetric key sizes, just the text: Security considerations for using Post-quantum Preshared Keys in the IKEv2 protocol are discussed in [RFC8784]. Should errata be issued for RFC 9867 as well? Just because the referenced text has become not up to date? This does looks weird to me... Regards, Valery. _____ > > IPsec mailing list -- [email protected] > > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > > -- > [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ > IPsec mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
