Hi matt and team,
The organisation are indeed moving to PQC but the bandwidth chocking is the limitations.
I am planning to migrate my Zscaler vpn profiles configured on versa Verizon sdwan to the PQC but hopping for the vendor support.
Although I have created a tailored solutions of vpn end to end but still they are relying on trusted TPRM approved vendors who are way behind the support for PQC.
To check out my work please see my freeprint, I am open to publish it too but lack of funds
https://www.techrxiv.org/doi/full/10.36227/techrxiv.176127352.21222483/v2
Please open a conversation I will be happy to understand and join you. Due to some busy schedule which I will be released from my notice period will get more time to contribute to this body.
With regards,
Siddesh vilas pawar
+919867080406
On 16 May 2026 12:36 am, Matt Ige <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi,I’m reaching out to understand how others are approaching the integration of post-quantum cryptography (PQC) into their IPsec/IKEv2 implementations.
We are currently looking at the CNSA 2.0 IPsec profile draft as a reference: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-guthrie-cnsa2-ipsec-profile
I have a couple of specific questions:1. Beyond what is outlined in this draft, are there additional requirements, design considerations, or extensions that implementations are incorporating in practice?2. Are there organizations actively implementing PQC for IPsec that would be interested in interoperability testing or collaboration?
We are actively working on our implementation and are particularly interested in ensuring alignment with emerging standards and ecosystem compatibility. I appreciate any insights or pointers.
Thanks,
Matt
_______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
