Thanks Chris, I addressed it in -09. -----Original Message----- From: Christopher Inacio via Datatracker <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, July 1, 2026 9:21 PM To: The IESG <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: [EXTERNAL] [IPsec] Christopher Inacio's No Objection on draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-mlkem-08: (with COMMENT)
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the content is safe. Christopher Inacio has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-mlkem-08: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-mlkem/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks to Scott F. for the nice shepherd's write up. Thanks for the concise draft; it's also appreciated that it adds PQC into a flexible framework, that's easier!! I just have one comment and it should be a simple (trivial even) fix: * It would be really helpful if at the end of the opening paragraph of section 1, something like the following was added: “The following terms KEi, KEr, … are used as defined in RFC7296” _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
